Fact-Checking Policy

iDesign ARC commits to presenting accurate and reliable information across all content. This Fact-Checking Policy outlines our process for ensuring truthfulness and clarity for our readers. We believe a dedication to factual integrity builds trust within the design and architecture community.

Verification Before Publication

Our editorial team reviews all factual statements before an article goes live. This process confirms the accuracy of data, statistics, names, dates, and direct quotes. Editors cross-reference claims against multiple reliable sources to prevent errors from reaching publication.

Sourcing Standards

We prioritize highly credible sources for all our content. Primary sources, such as original research, official government reports, direct interviews, or first-hand accounts, receive the highest priority. Peer-reviewed academic journals, reputable institutional data, and established industry standards also serve as strong foundations.

Secondary sources are used only when they accurately cite and interpret primary data. We scrutinize the authority and potential biases of all sources to ensure objectivity. Information published on iDesign ARC reflects current understanding in relevant fields.

Evaluating Claims

Each factual claim undergoes careful scrutiny by our editors. We examine the context of the information, the original intent of the source, and any potential biases. We verify the recency of data and check for consensus among authorities in the design, art, and creative industries.

Unverifiable Claims

If a factual claim cannot be independently verified through our established sourcing standards, we will not publish it as fact. We either remove the unverified statement entirely or attribute it clearly as a theory, hypothesis, or opinion. Transparency remains a core principle of our editorial process.

Distinction Between Fact and Opinion

iDesign ARC maintains a clear distinction between factual reporting and editorial opinion. Articles presenting verifiable facts adhere to objective standards. Pieces containing personal views, interpretations, or predictions are clearly labeled as opinion or analysis.

Reader Reporting Process

We welcome reader feedback to help us maintain accuracy and integrity. If you believe an article on iDesign ARC contains a factual error, please contact our editorial team. Provide specific details, including the article title, the incorrect statement, and a link to a credible source for correction.

Upon receiving a correction request, our editors investigate the claim promptly. If an error is confirmed, we correct the article as soon as possible. Significant factual errors will result in an editor’s note appended to the article, detailing the change. Minor corrections may occur without explicit notification.

Send correction requests to: [email protected]

This policy was last updated in March 2026.